The morning Manna
will be provided at 6am. Thanks.
Studying Ephesians in
the SSnet.org series Lesson 3, may the Holy Spirit be the speaker to your
heart.
The Topic today
is: “Ephesians and the problem of closing the tap by F. F. Bruce, Calvin and
Ford and opening of it by Adventism for Morning Manna of the Sabbath School
Lesson Ephesians”.
The Opening Hymn
will be 229 "Spirit of the Living God."
The Sabbath School
Quarterly, downloadable from SSnet.org in the Teacher's Edition is on page 34.
The SSnet.org site
allows anyone, anywhere to read the lesson in their own language. Choose your
own language to see God speaking also to your heart.
Why do you not
click on this now?
---Real Adventist Edition(today pages 42)
[pioneer support, proper holistic biblical theological analysis] Edition https://www.adultbiblestudyguide.org/pdf.php?file=2023:3Q:TE:PDFs:ETQ323_03.pdf
---Pro-Reformed [Calvinism, Lutheranism,
minimalist ontological] Edition (today until page 33)
https://www.adultbiblestudyguide.org/pdf.php?file=2023:3Q:SE:PDFs:EAQ323_03.pdf
---Or
try in alternative this one: https://ssnet.org/lessons/23c/less02.html
---F. F. Bruce in 1984 wrote a commentary
on Ephesians and is cited in Tuesday section of the Walla Walla professor. ---He tries to break the “static” idea of
seating in heaven according to Psalm 110. ---Notice how his attempt falls short of
making the Father also mobile. ---In his suggestion we should only make
Christ and the Holy Spirit dynamic and the Father remains static. ---Adventism as we have shown in the work
also of Daekuk Nam and William Shea are making all three of the Trinity dynamic
with a “mobile throne” evidence from the Old Testament. ---F. F. Bruce was the mentor of Desmond
Ford. He injected him with preterism and in the center of Daniel one can see
how Ford is changing from historicism to preterism. ---It makes a difference where you study
and secondly how deep your Adventist views are before you venture out in the
World for education. Is that not so? ---Preterism tries to just mirror
Ephesians back to us with no Sanctuary message. Why? That is the way Calvin
did. ---Calvin’s friends went deep into the
Sanctuary Message in Hebrews 7-10 but Calvin told them: “Do not waste your time
with the Sanctuary in Hebrews 7-10”. ---Can you see how Calvin shot himself in
the leg? My thinking is that is why he died so young. God could not use him any
longer. ---Calvin countered God’s message here. ---Calvin’s worship philosophy was:
Worship lies within the first four commandments of the Law of God. ---Again he shot himself in the leg
because he refused to see the Saturday Sabbath and kept to the Constantine
created Day of the Sun (paganism) = Day of the Lord (Catholics) theory. ---Through Calvin and Bruce and Ford
problems were carried into the Adventist church and lots of tithe money was
wasted due to his unnecessary “dust” that he kicked up in the 1970’s until he
was pronounced a heretic in 1980. --- Ephesians
1:23 “Which is His body, the fullness of him
that fills all in all.” ---…the completion of all those things in
all of completion. ---Christ will by doing the plan of the
Father in His prophetic program and His Sanctuary Service program complete all
the tasks that is on the Father’s agenda successfully and in all of these
completions Christ is the Completor. ---His glorious body will be the
completeness that fills all in all. ---Nice is it not? Is your faith following
Him in His incomplete work ongoing? ---From Cross to Throne in Sanctuary and
from Sanctuary to Cloud eventually to come. ---From F. F. Bruce, according to Ford’s
dissertation on Daniel, he took the wrong interpretation that Luke 21 (Romans
at Jerusalem’s gate 70-73 AD) = Mark 13 (Daniel 9:26-27 abomination) = Matthew
24 (Daniel 9:26-27 abomination). ---What is the problem? Jesus spoke twice
in parallelism the same sentence: one the interpretation of 9:26 with the
Romans as the wing and in 9:27 the 538 AD abomination of Justinian and the
beginning of the Holy Roman Empire. Luke heard only one (verse 26) but the
witnesses of Mark and Matthew heard only the second one (verse 27). ---What is the problem of Bruce and Ford?
They interpret only one and the same expression with two meanings and develop
the multiple application theory! ---Result: Little Horn is Antiochus and
whatever later as well principle. ---So at Glazier View Ford lost his
credentials because he is unbiblical. Does it make sense?