The morning Manna will be provided at 6am. Thanks.

Studying Ephesians in the SSnet.org series Lesson 3, may the Holy Spirit be the speaker to your heart.

The Topic today is: “Ephesians and the problem of closing the tap by F. F. Bruce, Calvin and Ford and opening of it by Adventism for Morning Manna of the Sabbath School Lesson Ephesians”.

The Opening Hymn will be 229 "Spirit of the Living God."

The Sabbath School Quarterly, downloadable from SSnet.org in the Teacher's Edition is on page 34.

The SSnet.org site allows anyone, anywhere to read the lesson in their own language. Choose your own language to see God speaking also to your heart.

Why do you not click on this now?

---Real Adventist Edition(today pages 42) [pioneer support, proper holistic biblical theological analysis] Edition https://www.adultbiblestudyguide.org/pdf.php?file=2023:3Q:TE:PDFs:ETQ323_03.pdf

---Pro-Reformed [Calvinism, Lutheranism, minimalist ontological] Edition (today until page 33)

 https://www.adultbiblestudyguide.org/pdf.php?file=2023:3Q:SE:PDFs:EAQ323_03.pdf

---Or try in alternative this one:  https://ssnet.org/lessons/23c/less02.html

---F. F. Bruce in 1984 wrote a commentary on Ephesians and is cited in Tuesday section of the Walla Walla professor.

---He tries to break the “static” idea of seating in heaven according to Psalm 110.

---Notice how his attempt falls short of making the Father also mobile.

---In his suggestion we should only make Christ and the Holy Spirit dynamic and the Father remains static.

---Adventism as we have shown in the work also of Daekuk Nam and William Shea are making all three of the Trinity dynamic with a “mobile throne” evidence from the Old Testament.

---F. F. Bruce was the mentor of Desmond Ford. He injected him with preterism and in the center of Daniel one can see how Ford is changing from historicism to preterism.

---It makes a difference where you study and secondly how deep your Adventist views are before you venture out in the World for education. Is that not so?

---Preterism tries to just mirror Ephesians back to us with no Sanctuary message. Why? That is the way Calvin did.

---Calvin’s friends went deep into the Sanctuary Message in Hebrews 7-10 but Calvin told them: “Do not waste your time with the Sanctuary in Hebrews 7-10”.

---Can you see how Calvin shot himself in the leg? My thinking is that is why he died so young. God could not use him any longer.

---Calvin countered God’s message here.

---Calvin’s worship philosophy was: Worship lies within the first four commandments of the Law of God.

---Again he shot himself in the leg because he refused to see the Saturday Sabbath and kept to the Constantine created Day of the Sun (paganism) = Day of the Lord (Catholics) theory.

---Through Calvin and Bruce and Ford problems were carried into the Adventist church and lots of tithe money was wasted due to his unnecessary “dust” that he kicked up in the 1970’s until he was pronounced a heretic in 1980.

--- Ephesians 1:23 “Which is His body, the fullness of him that fills all in all.”

---…the completion of all those things in all of completion.

---Christ will by doing the plan of the Father in His prophetic program and His Sanctuary Service program complete all the tasks that is on the Father’s agenda successfully and in all of these completions Christ is the Completor.

---His glorious body will be the completeness that fills all in all.

---Nice is it not? Is your faith following Him in His incomplete work ongoing?

---From Cross to Throne in Sanctuary and from Sanctuary to Cloud eventually to come.

---From F. F. Bruce, according to Ford’s dissertation on Daniel, he took the wrong interpretation that Luke 21 (Romans at Jerusalem’s gate 70-73 AD) = Mark 13 (Daniel 9:26-27 abomination) = Matthew 24 (Daniel 9:26-27 abomination).

---What is the problem? Jesus spoke twice in parallelism the same sentence: one the interpretation of 9:26 with the Romans as the wing and in 9:27 the 538 AD abomination of Justinian and the beginning of the Holy Roman Empire. Luke heard only one (verse 26) but the witnesses of Mark and Matthew heard only the second one (verse 27).

---What is the problem of Bruce and Ford? They interpret only one and the same expression with two meanings and develop the multiple application theory!

---Result: Little Horn is Antiochus and whatever later as well principle.

---So at Glazier View Ford lost his credentials because he is unbiblical. Does it make sense? ---Is your pastor still clinging to Ford ideas in your congregation? Move. When? Right now.