The morning
Manna will be provided at 6am. Thanks. Studying Death,
Dying and Future Hope in the SSnet.org series Lesson 4, may the Holy Spirit
be the speaker to your heart. The Topic today
is: “Daniel 12 and Christ as Michael resurrecting at His Second Coming for Morning
Manna of the Sabbath School Lesson Death, Dying and Future Hope”. The Opening
Hymn will be 229 "Spirit of the Living God" The Sabbath
School Quarterly, downloadable from SSnet.org in the Teacher's Edition is on
page 48 and for the laymen edition or Standard Edition, on page 34. The SSnet.org
site allows anyone, anywhere to read the lesson in their own language. Choose
your own language to see God speaking also to your heart. Why do you not
click on this now? --- https://absg.adventist.org/pdf.php?file=2022:4Q:SE:PDFs:EAQ422_04.pdf ---The
superimposition of Antiochus Epihanes and his history over the Book of Daniel
makes it impossible for scholars on Daniel from other church denominations to
properly interpret Daniel. ---Not with
Adventists. The interpretation is very direct and very simple and in my view,
very correct. ---The prince
references in Daniel all point to Christ and His coming Kingdom. ---Daniel
12:1-2 with that Resurrection at the Second Coming, is a reference of Michael
to Christ. ---The lesson
listed the references in Daniel all pointing to Christ as the prince. ---Why would
all point to Christ but Daniel 12:1 must now be something else? ---The problem
then with other Publishing Houses on Daniel commentaries is that they are in a “denial
mode”. If you deny Daniel its ability to predict the future, predict Christ’s
very year of crucifixion, His year of Baptism, then you certainly is going to
run into flat spins on Daniel. And they do. ---They run to
the church fathers and to each other on the SBL meetings from Catholic, Judaism
and Protestant preteristic persuasions. Full of problems in identifying aspects
of Daniel with time, persons, events, and applications. ---Why is
Adventism so consistent through the years? Historicism as method of analysis.
That is why. ---