The morning Manna will be provided at 6am. Thanks. Studying Three Cosmic Messages in the SSnet.org series
Lesson 6, may the Holy Spirit be the speaker to your heart. The Topic today is: “Thomas Aquinas the Catholic believed in the
year-day principle for Daniel 9 but missed it for Daniel 8:14 for Morning Manna
of the Sabbath School Lesson on the Time of the Judgment”. The Sabbath School Quarterly, downloadable from SSnet.org in the
Teacher's Edition is on page 46. The SSnet.org site allows anyone, anywhere to read the lesson in
their own language. Choose your own language to see God speaking also to your
heart. Why do you not click on this now? --- https://absg.adventist.org/pdf.php?file=2023:2Q:SE:PDFs:EAQ223_06.pdf ---You must remember that there is no other church that has such a
developed grand view of the Judgment, time, process, significance, relevancy to
salvation, immediacy as Seventh Day Adventists. ---All other Reformers groups are working with a minimalist view of
the Judgment. Judgment is everyday. Or judgment is when you die. Or judgment
will be one time at the end when all will come together before God. ---Not so, said the Bible in the judgment time prophecies and
judgment process prophecies in Daniel, Revelation and Hebrews. The Sanctuary
typology are all interconnected with this. This is the recipe. Show me the
cake! ---Finley says that “Some argue that the 2,300 days are literal
days.” Oops. Desmond Ford tried to say it following F. F. Bruce of Manchester
University, and got in trouble with Adventism and was fired after a big
conference in 1980 at Glazier View. He said many of the wrong things Finley is
listing here. Non Adventism. But well-backed Reformed ideas. ---“They [Ford and others] also believe that this little horn of
Daniel 8 applies to the Seleucid military leader Antiochus Epiphanes (216
b.c.–164 b.c.), who attacked Jerusalem and defiled the Jewish temple, even
though 2,300 days does not fit even his time frame.” ---The heathen Porphyry interpreted Daniel like this in the 4th
century and Jerome reacted vehemently against him saying this is impossible if
you calculate history of Antiochus very carefully. See Jerome’s commentary on
Daniel and his attack of Antiochus Epiphanes as the little horn. Cannot work
mathematically. So Jerome said: reject. ---As Edwin Heppenstall showed in Christ our High Priest and
William Shea in his lectures in DARCOM and all good Adventist explainers of
Daniel 7, the Judgment of the Little Horn and the Little Horn is only after the
four empires during them! ---“This interpretation, however, is contrary to the angel’s clear
instruction that the vision applies to the “time of the end.” Antiochus
Epiphanes certainly did not live at the time of the end. ---In Daniel 8:13-14 Gabriel begins his explanation of the
2,300-day prophecy. ---He names the ram as representing Media-Persia and the
male goat as representing Greece (Dan. 8:20, 21). Though not named, as are the
two powers before it, the next entity, the little horn, is obviously Rome (Dan.
8:9, 23, 24). ---“He then depicts a kind of religiopolitical phase of Rome, which
would “cast down the truth to the ground” (Dan. 8:10–12, 25) and interfere with
Christ’s heavenly ministry (Dan. 8:10–12).” ---Always remember here that verse 10 is feminine in verbs because
the little horn is feminine. The papacy. The church the woman as symbol of the
church. ---In verse 11, Daniel 8:11, the verbs are masculine! What! A
trans-sexual power here? ---Will explain soon. Let’s finish. ---In verse 12, Daniel 8:12, the verbs are feminine again. ---What is going one here? Feminine = horn = papacy verse 10; masculine
= WHO? Verse 11; Feminine = horn = papacy verse 12 again. ---Answer: Satan. Verse 11 refers to the same verbal masculine
forms of casting down in Isaiah 14:12-14 and Ezechiel 28 with the description
of Satan and Lucifer. Daniel was shown the heart of the papacy: Satan’s actions
in the past. ---Unmasking the Little Horn and you see the papacy. Unmasking he
papacy and you end with Satan in Daniel 8:11 masculine verbs. Nice right? ---“The cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8:14, the climax of
the chapter, is God’s answer to the challenge of earthly and religious powers
that have attempted to usurp the authority of God. ---Daniel 8:14 solves the universe problem created by Satan and
created by his agencies the papacy on earth. ---But after God gave this vision to Daniel He did not explain it
fully but left the explanation for another vision in Daniel 9 to be connected
to this one in many ways: Christ, time, beginning time, purpose, solution. ---Do you know that the Catholic Church came to understand also the
year day principle. Do you know that the Reformers like George Joye [1542] came
to understand it? Hugo Grotius the Calvinist Lawyer around 1650 AD? ---The Catholic Thomas Aquinas agreed that the 490 years of Daniel
9:24-27 pointed to the baptism and death of Christ! Was he an Adventist before
an Adventist? ---I do not know how this happened in the 12th century
AD in Europe but that is what he believed. Catholic Father and Theologian of
them. ---The starting date of that understanding, Ezra 7 and 457 BC in
Daniel 9:24-27, the Catholics and Reformers were supposed to transfer to Daniel
8:14 for the 2300 years not days but prophetic days as years calculation. They
did not. ---Result? They know nothing about the 1844 Judgment to begin in
heaven. ---The first serious studies on the Sanctuary in Heaven theology in
Adventism was on the 1st of January 1845 by O. R. L. Crosier which
was a study on the typology of the sanctuary. Combined with Hiram Edson’s
revelation, you can thank God for leading these men to the full truth and not
half-truths as the Catholics and Reformers are providing today. ---Are you still sitting in a church with half-truths? Is it an
Adventist church with Ford-like ideas by a pastor? What should you do? Get out.
When. Now.