Pelagius
condemned by Augustine as a Heretic ---Augustine was the one who told the pope
to make Pelagius a heretic, says Cornelius Jansen in 1660. (Jansen 1660: 18, 27
where he told pope Innocentius that he is a heretic). ---Cornelius Jansen was a Catholic and
wrote a research on Augustine and the Pelagian controversy. ---Why is it relevant for Adventists?
Was it not for QOD by Froom, in 1957 there would not have been an Augustine //
Pelagian split in the Adventist church. ---The Reformers loved Augustine but not
Pelagius. ---Froom wanted to apply for society
recognition of Adventists and had to bow for Reformation Soteriology or
Salvation History or Augustinian views, see the Institutes of Calvin in the
footnotes how much he cited Augustine positively. ---Ellen White was sometimes similar to
Augustine and mostly a view similar to Pelagius or what we call semi-Pelagius. ---If someone cites only Reformatory
scooped up citations of Ellen White and ends with a pro-Augustine view of
Salvation, then that is a skew Ellen White and not a proper Ellen White.
Welcome to Froom. ---You are most welcome to be shocked
and not wishing to continue. ---But reading the books by H. Douglas
and J. Zurcher you will be enlightened by the original data for yourself. ---Regarding Augustine and Pelagius you
need to know this: Augustine argues from ontology or his logic from his
experience. Pelagius argues from Scriptural text to scriptural text. ---When Augustine tries to prove a
point, he says Euripides, Plato, our scholastic fathers, I say such and such.
When Pelagius tries to prove a point, he says go to Ezechiel 18 and see there
is no original sin there. And what happened when Cornelius Jansen 1660 came to
this point? He said: let us change the topic and discuss something else. No
counter answer from either Augustine or Jansen. ---You need to know that also Dennis
Priebe used Ezechiel 18 and everyone that argues against original sin will use
this text. It is powerful words by God not Plato or feelings. Right? ---Augustine felt that Grace took over
the will of man completely from A to Z. 아우구스티누스는 펠라기우스를
이단자로 정죄함 ---어거스틴은 1660년에 펠라기우스를 이단자로 만들라고 교황에게 말한 사람이라고
Cornelius Jansen은
말합니다. ---Cornelius Jansen은 가톨릭 신자였으며
Augustine과
Pelagian 논쟁에 대한 연구를 저술했습니다. ---왜 재림교인과 관련이 있습니까? Froom의 QOD가 아니었다면 1957년에 재림교회에서
Augustine // Pelagian 분열이
없었을 것입니다. ---개혁자들은 어거스틴을 사랑했지만 펠라기우스는 사랑하지 않았습니다. ---Froom은 재림교인의 사회 인정을 신청하기를 원했고 종교개혁 구원론이나 구원사 또는 아우구스티누스의 견해에 굴복해야 했습니다. ---엘렌 화잇은 때때로 어거스틴과 유사했고 대부분 펠라기우스 또는 우리가 세미-펠라기우스라고 부르는 것과 유사한 견해였습니다. ---누군가가 종교 개혁가가 엘렌 화잇을 인용한 것만 인용하고 구원에 대한 아우구스티누스적 견해로 끝난다면 그것은 잘못된 엘렌 화잇이지 적절한 엘렌 화잇이 아닙니다. 프룸에 오신 것을 환영합니다. ---당신은 충격을 받고 계속하기를 원하지 않는 것을 환영합니다. ---하지만 H. Douglas와 J.
Zurcher가 쓴 책을 읽으면 원본 데이터를 통해 깨달음을 얻게 될 것입니다. ---어거스틴과 펠라기우스에 관하여 당신은 이것을 알아야 합니다: 어거스틴은 존재론 또는 그의 경험으로부터 그의 논리를 주장합니다