Cultural
bricolage, Secularism and Truth
(Koot
van Wyk, Kyungpook National University, Sangju Campus, South Korea, 9th
of January 2021)
Truth
and Culture are two swords rubbing against each other. Both consist of values,
morals, right and wrong conceptions, destiny perceptions, love versus hate
scenarios, loyalty expectations but what separates them is that the origin of
the first is from above and the origin of the second is from below. It is the
difference what is given by God through revelation or what is worked out with
human reason and passions from below.
Truth
in Adventism
Truth
in Adventist definition ever since early 1844 is biblical orientated lense
through which anything isvaluated and accepted as correct or not. The pioneers
all followed the same procedure as one can see in the journals like Review and
Herald and other online sources from them. The Bible says….approach.
Rebels
in Adventism
Here
and there were rebellious approaches by, well, rebels and not heroes as Arthur
Patrick tried to demonstrate in his 2008 overview of bibliography and
scholarship in contemporary Adventism. Scholar from California, then Avondale
closely linked with Ford since 1973. Villains cannot be made heroes in
Adventism because of the Bible only approach. Those who reject Adventist
doctrine soon rejects Ellen White’s Inspiration as well. That is a fact. They
soon lament on the so-called ‘absence of the Investigative Judgment doctrine in
the Bible’ a common cry by all rebels. Raymond Cottrell a Spectrum contributor
in the 70’s did it and he was not happy with Gerhard Hasel at all.
Hasel
was insisting on the superiority of Revelation above Cultural or human reason
but Cottrell, Spectrum, Adventist Today and other California networks and links
online tries to reverse this order by placing Culture over Revelation.
Abortion, Gender issues, woman in the work-space including the pastoral role,
challenging the biblical seven day creation period are added to place culture
above the biblical approach. They are quickly to put the Bible not as what it
means today but what it meant then. A separation between old and new. So they develop
the concept of “conservative” and “progressive”.
Conservative
versus Progressive debate
In
his video on the subject, the Calvinist turned Catholic philosopher Peter
Kreeft said:
“Worst
of all, Progressivism clearly contradicts the very idea of a divine revelation.
If there is such a revelation, Progressivism corrects it, corrects God Himself,
and arrogates to itself the right to edit rather than deliver the divine mail,
evaluating it by dating its postmark. Even religions that do not claim a direct
divine revelation, like Confucianism, Taoism, or Buddhism, get their teachings
from their past, from their founders. Progressivists make it up as they go
along.’”
(Peter
Kreeft, Progressivism: The Snobbery of Chronology
September
10, 2010. Downloaded from http://www.patheos.com/Resources/AdditionalResources/Progressivism-The-Snobbery-of-Chronology.html)
Missionary
to Africa, Colenso suffering a class of cultural civilizations
In
the colonial period missionaries moved to Africa and they brought with them
their culture and religion and was focused to share religion with those who did
not know at all. In a very good article, Jonathan A. Draper indicated what
happened to John Colenso between 1864-1884 in Africa when some form of “mixture”
took place in the missionary process of this missionary to Africans, the Zulus.
In one place Colenso said that he find it difficult to condemn the Zulus for
their faith in superstition, seeing that Higher Criticism, which he endorse, do
not believe in miracles and supernatural. Here, according to my view, lies the
problem with Colenso. He was not a proper Anglican and neither a proper
Adventist to know that he should stick to the norm of the Bible and do not
compromise on the way. You cannot make it up as you go along.
How
the Process of acculturation works, by Draper and Legge
In
this article. J. A. Draper cites M. Legge describing the process of borrowing
good and bad from others. This description tells us exactly how the process of
secularism originates. Let us take lessons from it.
"In
this contestation both parties became bricoleurs, in their own ways,
sorting through the debris of the two collapsing social universes for usable
odds and ends of culture. Of course it is more obvious in the case of the
African converts, since their predicament was the more severe, but it was true
also for the missionaries as well, since they constantly found that things did
not work as they should and their received ideas were challenged. Both parties
engaged in the work of cultural bricolage, as this has been aptly
defined (and positively evaluated) by Marilyn Legge (1997:6) in her attempt to
address the crisis of the Christian faith in the post-modern era as 'the art of
using what is at hand, odd materials for purposes other than intended, to
create something useful and distinct to meet a yearning or need. This is an
accessible practice often found when people aim to survive against the
odds'".
(J.
A. Draper, Colenso's Commentary on Romans: An Exegetical Assessment page 107).
Look
at the process of bricolage again. Bricolage happen when both
sides are in decadence. When religious leaders are not doing their job, are not
watchers on the walls for errors creeping in doctrines, are lame with
discipline required, are playing around with surrounding forms of music and
preaching styles. Borrowing sermons from tapes, books, without synchronizing it
with the Adventist truth, then you have bricolage. A broken religion
that scoops up from whatever is around and that happens to be culture and what
it has to offer.
Secular
cults
In
this process of bricolage, secular institutions and secular agnostic,
atheistic people pick up from religion whatever is useful from religion, throw
away God from the wording and voice the same so-called values, morals that they
have designed from below around abortion, equality paradigms, gender
strangeness recognition, woman in all roles recognized, and the green theology
sacredly accepted as a duty to their god, mother earth. It is with these values
that people with weak religious convictions scoop up and go along with culture
and take hands also going through a process of bricolage. End-result:
skew Adventism. Off-road doctrinal positions on the Investigative Judgment. The
Nature of Man related to the possibility of attaining perfection.
The
way now
Bible
believing worshippers are the only ones that will be sealed by the Holy Spirit.
It was not allowed to be wishy washy in the Old Testament and that is
also not permitted today. The biblical message for all generation are the same.
Unaltered. It is not the biblical message that has to change. It is not
doctrines that has to change. It is people that must not be deceived by bricolage
around them and participating in this disease that could keep them out of the
Kingdom of God.