Dead Cult of, Familiar Spirits Linguistic considerations: “The Hebrew nouns commonly associated with
necromancy are ,עפר ,אוב and אוב
.ידעני is usually paired with verbs that indicate inquiry for
information and seems to indicate a conscious, yet unidentifiable, being,
though it can refer to either the medium or ghost. The LXX translation of אוב
is “ventriloquist,” to denote chirping or muttering, though this may not be an
accurate representation of the word either, as it does not harmonize all of the
word’s aspects. ידעני is often paired with אוב,
though not always. Many commentators have also associated ידענים
with chirping or muttering sounds either emitted from the ghost or the medium. עפר
is thought to carry the sense of loose earth or dust. The latter often connotes
mourning and self-abasement; however, when seen in conjunction with the words
previously discussed, the context signifies the grave and netherworld.
Furthermore, the inhabitants of the ancient underworld were thought to dwell in
fields of dust, thereby becoming persons of dust themselves.” (Brown, 2015 page
29). There was an Egyptian word ab that meant “to
sink into [the ground]”. It can also mean “to face or meet someone” and
thirdly, it can mean “a bird with a loud harsh voice”. One must keep in mind
that Moses wrote Genesis as a person very knowledgeable of Middle Egyptian, a
language that he was taught when he arrived in 1518 BCE in the court of
Hatshepsut and writing Genesis in 1460 BCE in Midian and Leviticus in 1448 BCE
and later, he used many Hebraised Egyptian loanwords, as one can see clearly in
his epic of Job when one is confronted with hapax legomena. The difficult part
is to find the exact Egyptian phonetics and precise word that Moses had in mind
since the dictionary offers a multiplicity of options and sometimes many of
them are equally interesting as candidate. The Late Egyptian word wb3 has the
consonants in a different order but meant “to open; to be enlightened” which is
connected to the Hebrew word ידעני. In the case of similar sounds in Late Egyptian wpì means “to
open, reveal, disclose, to explain”. The consonants of the Hebrew is in a
different order though. Cult of the Dead as general human construct
based on perception of life after death The Cult of the Dead is a human phenomenon and
construct in which they wish to turn the clock of death back by “running after
the dead” in order to bring them back to the present and come to grips
psychologically with finality. All nations of the Levant, and nations of all
continents in later histories all the way to modern times participate in
rituals of the Cult of the Dead. The state of the Dead epistemology put glasses
on readers of the Bible and they then seek to interpret texts of the Bible that
fits their own preconceived ideology. The consensus of all sinful human beings,
without a thorough understanding of the Word of God, is to accept that humans
still live after death. That leads to the creation of the Cult of the Dead
practices globally. Satan in the snake form to Eve in Genesis 3 said that even though
God said that the sinner will die, it is not so. They will not die. Sinners
operate with this Satanic axiom. Biblical revelation and Necromancy or Talking
to the Dead When Keil and Delitzsch commented on this
verse in 1864 they listed all the texts that are going to be mentioned and
said: “True fear of God, however, awakens confidence in the Lord and His
guidance, and excludes all superstitious and idolatrous ways and methods of
discovering the future. This thought prepares the way for the warning against
turning to familiar spirits, or seeking after wizards” (Keil and Delitzsch
1864, Vol. I: 425). The concept of ghost or soul of the departed
(see Keil and Delitzsch Vol. I: 425), is a modern one and not that of the
biblical text and its times (see BDB 1996 from 1906 page 15 last comment in
brackets). Contrary to the Mormon view presented by A.
Brown 2016 citing H. E. Mendez 2009: 4 that Leviticus 19:31 is not condemning
the practice of necromancy itself, only the seeking after it, the corpus of
biblical texts dealing with the subject definitely disassociate completely in
the absolute from any dealings or practice of necromancy. Satan’s insistence against God’s edict that
sinners will die, rephrasing it that they will not, is in line with the modern
concepts of the Dead Cult. The Bible is a consistent revelation of God and does
not contain conflicting ideas or a God with inconsistency in Himself.
Therefore, if Moses denounce the Dead Cult in Leviticus 19:31 it will be that
way throughout Scripture. Scholars who try to squeeze out necromancy in a
positive light do so with their own hidden agendas that is not supported by
Scriptures. Two scholars lamented that the archaeological
evidence does not give clarity how widespread necromancy was in Israel (P.
Johnston 2002 and B. B. Schmidt 1996; see A. Brown 2016: 29 at footnote 20). The
issue is not quantity of the phenomenon but the quality of spirituality
displayed according to the “blueprints” provided by Revelation. Honesty to the
Word was always the issue. For example, at Hazor cuneiform liver models were
discovered and they were used in necromancy practices. The Scriptural text is
clear in the upswing and downswing of spirituality when Israel ran after
outside nations’ downgrading practices including spiritism, witchcraft and
necromancy. In Leviticus 20:27 someone involved with this
cult should be killed to indicate God’s absolute prohibition and separation
from such activities. As Brown also indicated, Deuteronomy 18:10-12 kept to the
same prohibition and that is because God demands total surrender to Him. Saul’s encounter with the witch of 1 Samuel 28
is sometimes used by those who believe that after death souls still lives on.
Nothing can be further from the truth. Samuel was dead (1 Samuel 28:3). When
she saw someone coming up she did not say that she saw a human being coming up
out of the earth but a “divine being” (1 Samuel 28:13). Saul admitted that “God
has departed from me and answers me no more, either through prophets or through
dreams therefore I have called you” (1 Samuel 28:15). What a total
inconsistency in the domain of God. That it is possible to be God’s agent but
when God rejects a person that someone else can serve as a vicarius filii
dei or vicarius dei = substitute of God to still serve a rejected
human. Since the Lord rejected Saul Satan said to Saul in 1 Samuel 28:19 “therefore,
tomorrow you and your sons will be with me”. With him and against the Lord?
Then the entity who came up was not with God in the first place. The logic is
clear. It can only be Satan and his demons. Scholars miss these nuances in
their commentaries on Samuel. Ellen White sums it up exactly as my own
research has it as well: “When Saul inquired for Samuel, the Lord did not cause
Samuel to appear to Saul. He saw nothing. Satan was not allowed to disturb the
rest of Samuel in the grave, and bring him up in reality to the witch of Endor.
God does not give Satan power to resurrect the dead. But Satan’s angels assume
the form of dead friends, and speak and act like them, that through professed
dead friends, he can the better carry on his work of deception. Satan knew
Samuel well, and he knew how to represent him before the witch of Endor, and to
utter correctly the fate of Saul and his sons” (Vol. 4a Spiritual Gifts
1864: 84.2). 1 Chronicles 10:13–14 makes no secret of the
fact that Saul lost his kingship because of this sinful act of his “because he
asked counsel of a medium making enquiry”. Isaiah’s message in Isaiah 8:19–20 is 100% in
line with that of Moses and Samuel. There is no room for the Cult of the Dead
practices for any believer in the Revelation of God as revealed in the pages of
the biblical text. The doctrine of the Immortality of the Soul is
extra-biblical in the 12th book of The Republic by Plato
which he wrote after he travelled to Egypt to see their mystery religions and
became affected by them. Neo-Platonism in the Christian Church brought with it
many ideas from paganism of which this doctrine was one. However, it serves the
Cult of the Dead very well. The president of the USA’s wife talked regularly in
séance with Leanor Rooseveldt and thus the cult is existing while this is
written. Isaiah 19:3 was a promise of the destruction
of Egypt’s religion of consulting the Cult of the Dead. About Isaiah 29:4, A. Brown wrote that it “is
a compelling passage concerning necromancy in Isaiah, especially when viewed
within the parameters of Latter-day Saint interpretation”. The text reads: “And
brought down you shalt speak out of the ground, and your speech shall be low
out of the dust; and your voice shall be as of a ghost out of the ground, and your
speech shall chirp out of the dust” = וְשָׁפַלְתְּ מֵאֶרֶץ
תְּדַבֵּרִי וּמֵעָפָר תִּשַּׁח אִמְרָתֵךְ וְהָיָה כְּאוֹב מֵאֶרֶץ קוֹלֵךְ וּמֵעָפָר
אִמְרָתֵךְ תְּצַפְצֵף. These are the actual sounds that Satan makes in séance and
Spiritism. They are real and not just imaginations. Isaiah let Satan
speaks seemingly in Isaiah 29: 2-3. Satan explains his agenda with the “lion of
God” temple or sanctuary of God on earth: he will bring distress there and
there shall be lamenting and mourning (v. 2a-b). We know it is Satan because he
says “she shall be like an Ariel [lion of God] to me” (v. 2c). For the suffering
city to switch around and become a lion to the afflicter means that God took
control to punish Satan and his proxies. This phrase is the reason for
identifying Satan here. It is not God who will wage war against Ariel and Satan
says that he will “camp against” the city and encircles it with the Assyrian
armies in Sennacherib’s day in 701 BCE and again in 689 BCE. With siege-works and
battle towers Satan will be placed against Jerusalem in the days of
Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BCE (v. 3b-c). The remnant of God
shall be brought low (v. 4a). From earth they will speak to God (v. 4b). From
the dust shall come low their words. And it shall be like a ghost from the
earth will their voice speak out of the dust, their speech shall whisper (v.
4a-f). Spiritism is a reality of the bad and not the good. It is connected to
Satan. But when the remnant speaks in the dust, it will be at the Resurrection
at the Second Coming of Christ (Daniel 12:1-2). Isaiah says that though they
died and were brought low, yet will they awaken from their sleep and speak from
the dust where the Creative God will recreate them according to a sanctified
and perfect DNA. The multitude of
enemies of the remnant, shall become like dust at the Second Coming (v. 5a).
The ruthless ones shall become like chaff that the wind blows (v. 5b). “And it
shall happen instantly, suddenly” (v. 5c). The New Testament says also that it
will be suddenly. To explain this passage which is confusing to
A. Brown, she suggests the opinion of Jonathan Stökl’s words: “it is easier to
assume that idioms from the polytheistic past are still being used in a
monotheistic environment.” There is this false perception by consensus of
scholars that Israelite religion started out polytheistic and later became
monotheistic. They are almost on the right track but wrong. The Trinity
Doctrine is throughout the Old Testament and is the most thorny issue in
Judaism so that they alter the Old Testament consonants to bypass these cases:
Genesis 1, Amos 1-2, Psalm 110 etc. God never revealed Himself to Adam or
successor or the remnant first through polytheism and then later through
monotheism. Egypt and the Cult of the Dead Egyptian Cult of the Dead was the subject of
the study of C. Manassa (2012). “The akh-power [Egyptian word 3ḫ] of a deceased
individual enables him or her to interact with the world of the divine,
participating in the daily solar cycle, and to return to the world of the
living. The cult of the dead harnesses the akh-powers of the deceased, transforming
the effectiveness latent in the otherworld into immanent effects within this
world.” Textual evidence in Egypt: Tomb-texts: Many texts in
the Fifth Dynasty in which long private tomb inscriptions could be found
(Manassa 2012). Ceremonial Cult rooms: In the late
pre-dynastic period elite tombs at Hierakonpolis had subterranean chambers and
a ceremonial complex for the Cult of the Dead. It was constructed of costly
wood and adorned with colorful panels (R. Friedman). At Abydos such structures
were large (O’Connor, see Manassa 2012). Cult participation by way-station system: Deceased king
could continue after his death to participate in festivals (Serrano). In the
Middle Kingdom cenotaphs or small shrines at Abydos lined the processional
route so that the dead can participate all along the way. Burying of cult figurines near grave sites: A living king
could allow subjects to bury shabti figures near cult places or sacred animals
(Pumpenmeier). Communication to the dead in the Cult of the
Dead: Festivals were the setting of the
communication with the dead in the Cult of the Dead (see Book of Traversing
Eternity, Smith: 395–436). Bipartite Construction to allow Cult of the
Dead process: A Theban Tomb of the 18th dynasty
illustrates the Cult of the Dead very well (Kamp-Seyfried. See Manassa 2012).
All tombs had a bipartite construction so that one room is under the earth but another
above and well decorated. If they are too poor to have a second above ground “chapel”
for the Dead then there were ceramic offering platters or soul-houses (Leclère).
High-level administrators and military officers of the 18th dynasty
had a T-shaped chapel with painted scenes and lengthy texts (Hartwig, see
Manassa 2012). Beautiful Festival of the Valley Cult of the
Dead Text: The festival of the Beautiful Festival of the
Valley (Hartwig:98–103) was in the 2nd month of Shomu. The bark of
Amun traveled from the Karnak temple to the West Bank and resting in the
temples of Deir el-Bahri (Smith 178-192; see Manassa 2012). It also went to the
other temples constructed in the New Kingdom. This festival was a celebration
of the rebirth of the dead. They banquet in the tomb with king, commoners, with
processions and relatives. “During these festivals and on other occasions, the
living could communicate directly with deceased spirits.” This is very relevant
even in modern times since the wife of a recent president regularly
communicated with Eleanor Rooseveldt the wife of a president during the Second
World War. Letters of the Dead: Letters of
the Dead is another genre from the Old and New Kingdoms. They were written on
papyri, linen, ceramic vessels (Wente 210-219; see Manassa 2012). In the Middle
Kingdom they disappeared but the following texts from the New Kingdom: “The
Story of Khonsuem-hab and the Ghost,” “The Magician Merire (P. Van-dier),” and
the Setne-Khaemwaset Cycle) “indicate that belief in interactions between the
living and the dead continued to be an active part of Egyptian theology”
(Manassa 2012). The Late Period Egypt texts also explains the Cult of the Dead:
“lamentations” for Osiris attributed to Isis and Nephthys,” is almost love
poetry (Smith 74-75). Ancestor Cult of the Dead in households: “The cult of the dead was not a mechanical set
of rituals, but an emotionally charged interaction between the living and the
departed. Cults of the dead could also exist outside of strictly mortuary
contexts, and some evidence exists for ancestor cults within households”
(Fitzenreiter; see Manassa 2012). Deceased individuals cult: the cult of
the Old Kingdom viziers Mehu and Kagemni were limited to a few worshippers at Saqqara(Fischer,
see Manassa 2012); Imhotep, architect of Egypt’s first stone monument, the Step
Pyramid of Djoser, later enjoyed veneration at temples throughout Egypt (Aufrère;
Manassa 2012). In the 6th dynasty at Elephantine island a citizen
Heqaib made an offering chapel on the west bank and it became a religious
complex and worshippers dedicated stelae, statutes and other objects there (von
Pilgrim; see Manassa 2012). At Thebes Amenhotep III gave Amenhotep, a vizier, a
mortuary temple on the west bank and it had a cult until the Roman period
(Wildung; see Manassa). Authors of literary compositions are used in magical
incantations of the Cult of the Dead (Fischer-Elfert; see Manassa 2012). The
Dendur temple is an example of the deification of individuals, dedicated to two
drowned Nubian princes (Koenig; see Manassa). Pharaohs and their places of worship in the
Cult of the Dead: Pharaohs were worshipped at various
places in the Cult of the Dead: Amenhotep I and Ahmose-Nefertari at Luxor.
Mother and son oracle pronouncements were found with in Theban tombs
(Hollender; see Manassa 2012). In Nubia Senwosret III was a god and had a cult.
Ramesses II was deified in Egypt and Nubia (Habachi; see Manassa 2012). Animals sacred to deities had a Cult of the
Dead: Burial places of animals sacred to deities
also had a cult (Kessler; see Manassa 2012). “Private individuals could purchase a
mummified animal, such as an ibis, cat, or baboon, thus fulfilling the role of
Horus, the rightful heir, to a Osirian animal; such practices, which abounded
in Late Period Egypt, enabled a single person to participate multiple times in
a cult of the dead, independent of his or her family members.” (Manassa 2012). Ellen White’s view on the Dead Cult Ellen White received through the Holy Spirit
visions in sometimes very awkward circumstances but she did not in her scope
for the church spelled out a license to seek for supernatural communications in
public or private. In Great Controversy 556.2 she said in 1888: “The
work of dealing with familiar spirits was pronounced an abomination. . . .” In
1890 she wrote in Patriarchs and Prophets 685.4 she wrote: “1890;:“The
‘familiar spirits’ were not the spirits of the dead, but evil”. In 1890 in Patriarchs
and Prophets 689.1 she reiterated what Leviticus 19:31 is saying through
the Lord and by the hand of Moses after 1448 BCE: “Regard not them that have
familiar spirits, neither seek after wizards.” She commented on Isaiah 8:22 on June 24, 1915
in Review and Herald “Hope for the Heathen” saying: “The prophet was
permitted to look down the centuries to the time of the advent of the promised
Messiah.” The darkness of Isaiah 8:22 that Isaiah saw was: “Many who were
longing for the light of truth were being led astray by false teachers into the
bewildering mazes of philosophy and spiritism; others were placing their trust
in a form of godliness, but were not bringing true holiness into the life
practice.” In January 15 of 1914 in Review and Herald
paragraph 11, she denounced the role of seeking healing from spiritism: “The
apostles of nearly all forms of spiritism claim to have power to cure the
diseased. They attribute their power to electricity, magnetism, the so-called
“sympathetic remedies,” or to latent forces within the mind of man. And there
are not a few, even in this Christian age, who go to these healers, instead of
trusting in the power of the living God and the skill of well-qualified Christian
physicians. The mother, watching by the sick bed of her child, exclaims, “I can
do no more! Is there no physician who has power to restore my child?” She is
told of the wonderful cures performed by some clairvoyant or magnetic healer,
and she trusts her dear one to his charge, placing it as verily in the hand of
Satan as if he were standing by her side. In many instances the future life of
the child is controlled by a satanic power, which it seems impossible to break.
One can place all the works of Ellen White on this issue within the confounds
of the Scripture and there is no conflict with the counsel, commands, and
strong declarations of abomination that goes with consulting the dead. The view of the Seventh-day Adventist church
on the rejection of the Immortality of the Soul is in line with the counsel of
God against consulting the so-called dead which turn out to be Satan and his
demons. Seventh-day Adventist position on the
Immortality of the Soul unrelated to contemporary Dead Cults From the Fundamental Beliefs of the
Seventh-day Adventist church dating to 1953, one can cite their position in
line with the pioneers since the inception of the church: “[Doctrine] 9: “That
God ‘only hath immortality.’ 1 Tim. 6:15. Mortal man possesses a nature
inherently sinful and dying. Eternal life is the gift of God through faith in Christ. Rom. 6:23. ‘He that hath the Son hath
life.’ 1 John 5:12. Immortality is bestowed upon the righteous at the second
coming of Christ, when the righteous dead are raised from the grave and the
living righteous translated to meet the Lord. Then it is that those accounted
faithful "put on immortality.’ 1 Cor. 15:51-55. [Doctrine] 10. “That the
condition of man in death is one of unconsciousness. That all men, good and
evil alike, remain in the grave from death to the resurrection. Eccl. 9:5, 6;
Ps. 146 :3, 4; John 5:28, 29” (Fundamental beliefs of SDA's in 1953; Downloaded
on the 2nd of December 2018 from https://www.scribd.com/document/357659130/YB1953). Sources: Brown, Amanda C. (2016, January). "Out of
the Dust: An Examination of Necromancy as a Literary
Construct in the Book of Mormon." Studia Antiqua 14, no. 2, pp.
27-37. Downloaded on the 27th of November 2018 from https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol14/iss2/2 Brown, F., Driver, S. R., Briggs, C. A. (1906,
1996). A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Hendrickson
Publishers. Finkel, I. L. (1983). Necromancy in Ancient
Mesopotamia. Archiv für Orientförschung 29/30, pages 1-17. Fundamental beliefs of SDA's in 1953;
Downloaded on the 2nd of December 2018 from https://www.scribd.com/document/357659130/YB1953 Hoffner, H. A. Jr., (1967). “Second Millennium
Antecedents to the Hebrew ‘Ôḇ.” Journal of Biblical 86, no. 4,
pp. 385-401. Downloaded at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3262793. Keil, C. & Delitzsch, F. (1864), Biblical
Commentary on the Old Testament: Vol. I:
The Pentateuch. Edenburgh: T. & T. Clark. Keller, E. B. (1974). “Hebrew Thoughts on
Immortality and Resurrection.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5, pp. 20–21. King, P. J. & Stager, L. E. (2001). Life
in Biblical Israel. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001. Lesko, L. H. (1982). A Dictionary of Late
Egyptian. Vol. I. Berkeley California: B. C. Scribe Publications. Lewis, T. J. (1989, August 1). Cults of the
Dead in Ancient Israel and Ugarit. Harvard Semitic Monographs 39. Scholars
Press. Manassa, C. (2012). “Dead, Cult of the.” In Encyclopedia
of the Bible and Its Reception 6. Berlin/Boston:
Walter de Gruyter. Pp. 1-5. Downloaded on the 27th of November 2018
from https://www.academia.edu/2389832/Cult_of_the_Dead_Egypt. Mendez, H. E. (2009). “Condemnations of
Necromancy.” MA thesis, University of Georgia. Miller, F. (1978). “Prophecy in Judaism and
Islam.” Islamic Studies 17, pp. 27-44. Johnston, P. (2002). Shades of Sheol: Death
and Afterlife in the Old Testament. InterVarsity Press. Michael, M. (2014). “The Prophet, the
Witch and the Ghost: Understanding the Parody of Saul as a ‘Prophet’ and the Purpose of
Endor in the Deuteronomistic History.” Journal for the Study of the Old
Testament 38, no. 3, pp. 316–46. Perry, W. J. (1925, October). "The Cult
of the Sun and the Cult of the Dead in Egypt." The Journal of
Egyptian Archaeology Vol. 11, No. 3/4: 191-200. Published
by: Sage Publications, Ltd. DOI: 10.2307/3854140
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3854140 Schmidt, B. B. (1996). Israel’s Beneficent
Dead: Ancestor Cult and Necromancy in Ancient Israelite Religion and Tradition. Winona Lake,
IN: Eisenbrauns. Stökl, J. (2014). “Divination as Warfare: The
Use of Divination Across Borders.” In Divination, Politics
and Ancient Near Eastern Empires. Eds. J.
Stökl and A. Lenzi. Ancient Near Eastern Monographs 7. Atlanta: Society
for Biblical Literature. Pp. 49-63. White, E. Great Controversy, Patriarchs
and Prophets, Review and Herald